1 min read

Executive Summary: The Role of Crypto in Cross-Border Payments: The Ultimate Comparison

In this article, I compare different options for cross-border payments including traditional banking, fintechs, CBDCs, Bitcoin, and stablecoins. I analyze the mechanisms, pros and cons of each method to send international money transfers.
Executive Summary: The Role of Crypto in Cross-Border Payments: The Ultimate Comparison

Summary: The article compares different options for cross-border payments including correspondent banking, fintechs, CBDCs, Bitcoin, and stablecoins, analyzing their mechanisms, pros, cons, and ability to provide fast, inexpensive international money transfers.

What cross-border payments are:

  • Transactions between parties in different countries and currencies.
  • Includes retail (P2P) and wholesale (bank-bank).

How correspondent banking works:

  • Uses intermediary banks to facilitate currency exchange and settlement.
  • Relies on nostro/vostro accounts between banks.

Pros and cons of correspondent banking:

  • Well-established but expensive, slow, cumbersome.

How fintechs facilitate payments:

  • Leverage direct access to settlement systems, fewer intermediaries.
  • Faster and cheaper than traditional banking.

Pros and cons of fintechs:

  • Convenient, gaining market share. But liquidity and regulatory issues.

CBDCs for cross-border payments:

  • Enable fast settlement between CBDC systems.
  • But concerns around privacy and financial stability.

Pros and cons of Bitcoin:

  • Fast, inexpensive, outside money. But volatility, liquidity issues.

Pros and cons of stablecoins:

  • Price stability, efficient. But oligopolies, frozen transactions.

Full article:

The Role of Crypto in Cross-Border Payments: The Ultimate Comparison | CoinMarketCap
A comparison of different international payments options, including correspondent banks, fintech, central bank digital currencies, Bitcoin and stablecoins.